logo
Call Now
logo

Free Consultation

952-288-4667
  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Us Overview
    • Ronald F. Meuser, Jr.
    • Jennifer Yackley
    • Lindsey Meuser Rowland
    • Kathryn Ebnet
    • Daniel Harrison
    • Samantha Steward
    • Scott Rowland
    • Joshua Harrison
    • Nadya Yarmolich
    • George Berens
    • Eric Schwab
  • Practice Areas
    • PERA/MSRS
      • PERA/MSRS Benefits Overview
      • MSRS State Patrol Plan
      • MSRS Corrections Plan
      • PERA Police and Fire Plan
      • PERA Corrections Plan
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Healthcare Continuation
    • Personal Injury
    • PTSD
    • COVID-19
  • Testimonials
  • In The News
  • Blog
  • Videos
contact us

Animal Cruelty

Animal Cruelty

Part Four—Animal Cruelty Cases After The State v. Gerard Decision

May 19, 2015 by Meuser, Yackley & Rowland
Part Four—Animal Cruelty Cases After The State v. Gerard Decision

This is the fourth article of a five-part series on animal cruelty laws in Minnesota. This article will discuss the State v. Gerard decision and examine the impact the decision may have on the “unjustifiable” standard. While the court of appeals has… Read more »

Part Three—A Look At The Case Law: What Is An “Unjustified” Action Under The Minnesota Animal Cruelty Statute?

May 5, 2015 by Meuser, Yackley & Rowland
Part Three—A Look At The Case Law: What Is An “Unjustified” Action Under The Minnesota Animal Cruelty Statute?

In this third article of a five-part series on animal cruelty, we will learn what is considered an “unjustified” action in Minnesota. To prove animal torture or cruelty, the State must provide evidence that shows beyond a reasonable doubt the… Read more »

A Brief History Of The Animal Cruelty Standard In Minnesota

April 22, 2015 by Meuser, Yackley & Rowland
A Brief History Of The Animal Cruelty Standard In Minnesota

CONTENT: In this second article of a five-part series on animal cruelty, we will look at the history of animal cruelty laws in Minnesota. Early Standard Animal cruelty laws did not exist at common law; rather, such laws are statutory… Read more »

What Constitutes Justifiable Action under the Minnesota Animal Cruelty Statute?

April 14, 2015 by Meuser, Yackley & Rowland
What Constitutes Justifiable Action under the Minnesota Animal Cruelty Statute?

The law in Minnesota regarding dog bites is favorable to dog bite victims. The law covers bites and other injuries, incorporates an expansive definition of “owner,” including someone who merely harbors or keeps the dog, and it is not subject to the comparative negligence… Read more »

Recent Posts

  • What Are Claim Petitions?
  • Minnesota Independent Medical Examination (IME) Process: What You Need to Know
  • What is a Worker’s Comp Deposition?
  • Properly Filing a First Report of Injury
  • New PERA Legislation Puts Duty Disability Benefits in Jeopardy

Categories

  • ABOUT MEUSER, YACKLEY & ROWLAND, P.A.
  • CANCER
  • CONTINUATION OF HEALTHCARE BENEFITS
  • CORRECTIONS OFFICER
  • COVID-19
  • FIREFIGHTERS
  • HEART CONDITION
  • IN THE LINE OF DUTY
  • LIGHT DUTY
  • MSRS
  • PERA
  • PERSONAL INJURY
  • POLICE OFFICER
  • PTSD
  • QRC
  • RETURN TO WORK
  • UNCATEGORIZED
  • WORKERS' COMPENSATION

Archives

  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022


© 2021 Meuser, Yackley & Rowland, P.A. | Privacy Policy